HWBenchedge-AI hardware data, cited & graded

AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) vs Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P

FPGA / Versal coverage note: 1,243 rows come from the AMD Vitis AI 3.0/3.5 Model Zoo tables; 733 (59%) are image classification. Detection, segmentation and other workloads are thinner, and there is no LLM or speech data for these boards. All are vendor-published (grade D). FPGA / Versal overview.
AMDeval kit (adaptive SoC) · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.
Inteldatacenter server · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.

Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P is faster in all 4 like-for-like comparisons (largest gap: object detection, 184×).

AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV)Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P
Best object detection463 FPS D
Older data (2023)
5703 FPS D
undated
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data4 of 72 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mid-size CNN, batch unknown (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P CPU-only969 FPS
throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown
ssd-resnet34-1200
INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json)
undated
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV)5.26 FPS
E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown
tf_ssdresnet50v1_fpn_coco_640_640_178.4G
INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table
Older data (2023)
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class unknown, batch unknown (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P CPU-only5703 FPS
throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown
yolo_v8n
BF16 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · unknown
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json)
undated
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV)463 FPS
E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown
pt_yolox-nano_coco_416_416_1G
INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · unknown
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table
Older data (2023)

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) or Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

Only AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) has published pose estimation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV)372 FPS
E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown
pt_movenet_coco_192_192_0.5G
INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · unknown
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table
Older data (2023)

Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P:

◌

No published pose estimation results for Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P or AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mid-size CNN, batch unknown (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P CPU-only28295 FPS
throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown
resnet-50
INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json)
undated
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV)354 FPS
E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown
pt_OFA-resnet50_imagenet_160_160_0.88_1.8G
INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table
Older data (2023)
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mobile-class CNN, batch unknown (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P CPU-only36319 FPS
throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown
mobilenet-v2
INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json)
undated
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV)4325 FPS
E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown
tf_mobilenetv1_0.25_imagenet_128_128_27M
INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · mobile-class CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table
Older data (2023)

semantic segmentation

Only AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) has published semantic segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV)53.02 FPS
E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown
pt_SemanticFPN-mobilenetv2_cityscapes_512_1024_10G
INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · mobile-class CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table
Older data (2023)

Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P:

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P or AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) or Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU104 (ZU7EV) or Intel Xeon Platinum 6972P yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.