Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling): edge AI benchmarks

Name: Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
Brand: (independent test)

No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.

Vendor (independent test)Form factor independent test systemCompute GPUIndicative price unknownPower envelope unknownPublished rows 1

LLM generation19.59 tok/sC 0.0615 tok/s/W measuredundated

Best published result per workload, across model sizes — open “Show data” for like-for-like groups.

Show data — per-workload tables

object detection

◌

No published object detection results for Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Pi CM5 - 16GB (AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700) (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Like-for-like group	Best result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source · date	Rank in group
LLM 15–40B · b=1	19.59 tok/s	gpt-oss 20b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · llama.cpp (Vulkan)	C	318 W measured	Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) undated	20 of 22

How to read these numbers

Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.