HWBench

DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling): edge AI benchmarks

Vendor (independent test)Form factor independent test systemCompute as described in commentIndicative price unknownPower envelope unknownPublished rows 3
Showing the newest results per platform and source. 2 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 2 superseded by newer results from the same source.

Key results

How to read power: results are compared only within the same model. By efficiency ranks only results whose source publishes a power figure; By speed ranks every result. Measured = measured for this workload. Vendor-measured (typical/avg) = the vendor’s own measurement at typical or average load, not an independent test and not a maximum, so fps/W looks better than at max TDP. Chip, Module or Board TDP = the vendor’s published maximum, not measured. Typical power, not max TDP = only a typical figure is published, so fps/W looks better than at full load. Scope says what the watts cover: Accelerator only (host not included), Module, or Whole system. Max of range = top of a published range, so fps/W is a floor (≥). “— not published” = the source gives no power; we never estimate one.

Published results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling), per workload and model, with rank among boards on the same model
WorkloadModel · precisionResultPowerPerf/WRank on this modelGrade · dateSource
LLM generationdeepseek-r1:7bOllama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · batch 12.53 tok/s— not publishednot ranked by efficiency (no power published)
#3 of 3 by speed
C 2025-10-24 (page last edited)Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments)ai-benchmarks README @ 2f56f19

Ranks compare this board only with boards running the same model. Up to three models per workload; open a rank to see the full same-model table.

Show data — per-workload tables

object detection

◌

No published object detection results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Like-for-like groupBest resultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource · dateRank in group
LLM 5–14B · b=12.53 tok/sdeepseek-r1:7b
Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark)
Cunknown power not publishedJeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments)
2025-10-24 (page last edited)
61 of 66

Key results

How to read power: results are compared only within the same model. By efficiency ranks only results whose source publishes a power figure; By speed ranks every result. Measured = measured for this workload. Vendor-measured (typical/avg) = the vendor’s own measurement at typical or average load, not an independent test and not a maximum, so fps/W looks better than at max TDP. Chip, Module or Board TDP = the vendor’s published maximum, not measured. Typical power, not max TDP = only a typical figure is published, so fps/W looks better than at full load. Scope says what the watts cover: Accelerator only (host not included), Module, or Whole system. Max of range = top of a published range, so fps/W is a floor (≥). “— not published” = the source gives no power; we never estimate one.

Published results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling), per workload and model, with rank among boards on the same model
WorkloadModel · precisionResultPowerPerf/WRank on this modelGrade · dateSource
LLM generationdeepseek-r1:1.5bOllama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · batch 10.590 tok/s— not publishednot ranked by efficiency (no power published)
#4 of 5 by speed
C 2025-10-17 (page last edited)Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments)ai-benchmarks README @ 2f56f19
deepseek-r1:7bOllama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · batch 12.53 tok/s— not publishednot ranked by efficiency (no power published)
#3 of 3 by speed
C 2025-10-24 (page last edited)Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments)ai-benchmarks README @ 2f56f19
llama3.2:3bOllama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · batch 10.310 tok/s— not publishednot ranked by efficiency (no power published)
#33 of 35 by speed
C 2025-10-17 (page last edited)Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments)ai-benchmarks README @ 2f56f19

Ranks compare this board only with boards running the same model. Up to three models per workload; open a rank to see the full same-model table.

Show data — per-workload tables

object detection

◌

No published object detection results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard II (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Like-for-like groupBest resultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource · dateRank in group
LLM ≤4B · b=10.590 tok/sdeepseek-r1:1.5b
Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark)
Cunknown power not publishedJeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments)
2025-10-17 (page last edited)
78 of 81
LLM 5–14B · b=12.53 tok/sdeepseek-r1:7b
Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark)
Cunknown power not publishedJeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments)
2025-10-24 (page last edited)
61 of 66

Grades: A audited MLPerf · B third-party · C community · D vendor. How we rank · JSON