HWBench

Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) vs TI AM68A (8 TOPS)

Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) is faster in the only like-for-like comparison (largest gap: object detection, 1.40×).

Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)TI AM68A (8 TOPS)
Best object detection117 FPS D
2026-08-10 (published)
83.75 FPS C
Older data (2024)
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/a$174.197 list
Workloads with data3 of 71 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class unknown, batch 1 (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)117 FPS
throughput · b=1
yolo-v3-tiny-tf
FP16 · FPGA AI Suite 2026.1.1 / OpenVINO; IP throughput (hostless) · unknown
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Altera FPGA AI Suite Handbook (performance tables)
2026-08-10 (published)
TI AM68A (8 TOPS)83.75 FPS
inference_time · b=1
yolov7_tiny
INT8 · TI Edge AI SDK / TIDL (edgeai-benchmark) · unknown
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
TI edgeai-tensorlab tech report: speed/accuracy of object detection models (AM68A)
Older data (2024)

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)1391 FPS
throughput · b=1
mobilenet-v1-1.0-224
not stated in table (set by .arch file) · FPGA AI Suite 2026.1.1 / OpenVINO; IP throughput (hostless) · mobile-class CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Altera FPGA AI Suite Handbook (performance tables)
2026-08-10 (published)

TI AM68A (8 TOPS):

◌

No published image classification results for TI AM68A (8 TOPS) or Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

Only Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) has published semantic segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)10.26 FPS
throughput · b=1
unet-camvid-onnx-0001
not stated in table (set by .arch file) · FPGA AI Suite 2026.1.1 / OpenVINO; IP throughput (hostless) · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Altera FPGA AI Suite Handbook (performance tables)
2026-08-10 (published)

TI AM68A (8 TOPS):

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for TI AM68A (8 TOPS) or Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.