Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) vs Rockchip RK3562 (NPU)
Rockchipedge SoCNo licensed photo yet
Rockchipedge SoCNo licensed photo yet
Split result: Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) is faster in 7 and Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) in 4 of 11 like-for-like comparisons.
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 66.80 FPS C 2026-10-13 (page last edited) | 57.30 FPS C 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Power | n/a | n/a |
| Perf / W | n/a | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 4 of 7 | 5 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class small (YOLO-s), batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 37.20 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5s_relu INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · small (YOLO-s) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 33.70 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5s_relu INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · small (YOLO-s) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class nano (YOLO-n), batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 66.80 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov6n INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · nano (YOLO-n) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 57.30 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov6n INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · nano (YOLO-n) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class medium (YOLO-m), batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 13.30 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5m INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · medium (YOLO-m) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 10.80 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5m INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · medium (YOLO-m) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class unknown, batch 1 (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 37.40 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov7-tiny INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · unknown | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 37.20 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov7-tiny INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · unknown | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
instance segmentation
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class nano (YOLO-n), batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 49.60 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5n-seg INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · nano (YOLO-n) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 40.30 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5n-seg INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · nano (YOLO-n) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class small (YOLO-s), batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 22.50 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5s-seg INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · small (YOLO-s) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 18.30 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5s-seg INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · small (YOLO-s) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class medium (YOLO-m), batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 10.80 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5m-seg INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · medium (YOLO-m) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 8.40 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov5m-seg INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · medium (YOLO-m) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
pose estimation
Only Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) has published pose estimation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 32.40 FPS throughput · b=1 | yolov8n-pose INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · nano (YOLO-n) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
Rockchip RK1808 (NPU):
◌
No published pose estimation results for Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) or Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mobile-class CNN, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 289 FPS throughput · b=1 | mobilenetv2-12 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · mobile-class CNN | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 170 FPS throughput · b=1 | mobilenetv2-12 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · mobile-class CNN | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mid-size CNN, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 55.00 FPS throughput · b=1 | resnet50-v2-7 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · mid-size CNN | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 37.10 FPS throughput · b=1 | resnet50-v2-7 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · mid-size CNN | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
semantic segmentation
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mobile-class CNN, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 21.00 FPS throughput · b=1 | deeplab-v3-plus-mobilenet-v2 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · mobile-class CNN | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 4.40 FPS throughput · b=1 | deeplab-v3-plus-mobilenet-v2 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · mobile-class CNN | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class unknown, batch 1 (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) | 20.90 FPS throughput · b=1 | ppseg_lite_1024x512 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · unknown | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
| Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) | 14.10 FPS throughput · b=1 | ppseg_lite_1024x512 INT8 · RKNN-Toolkit2 / RKNPU (rknn_model_zoo) · unknown | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Rockchip rknn_model_zoo README benchmark table 2026-10-13 (page last edited) |
speech-to-text
◌
No published speech-to-text results for Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) or Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
◌
No published LLM generation results for Rockchip RK1808 (NPU) or Rockchip RK3562 (NPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.
Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.