NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 vs Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) is faster in all 2 like-for-like comparisons (largest gap: LLM generation, 3.22×).
| NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 | Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best LLM generation | 423 tok/s C 2026-07-21 (page last edited) | 214 tok/s C 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
| Power | n/a | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system |
| Perf / W | n/a | 0.669 tok/s/W ● Measured, Whole system |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 1 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
No published object detection results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 113 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | llama3.1:8b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM 5–14B | C | 471 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
| NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 | 35.00 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Qwen 3 8B NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM 5–14B | C | unknown power not published not published | NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json) 2026-07-21 (page last edited) |
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 214 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | deepseek-r1:1.5b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B | C | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
| NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 | 95.00 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Qwen3-VL-2B NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM ≤4B | C | unknown power not published not published | NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json) 2026-07-21 (page last edited) |
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) is faster in all 2 like-for-like comparisons (largest gap: LLM generation, 3.22×).
| NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 | Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best LLM generation | 423 tok/s C 2026-07-21 (page last edited) | 214 tok/s C 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
| Power | n/a | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system |
| Perf / W | n/a | 0.669 tok/s/W ● Measured, Whole system |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 1 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
No published object detection results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 113 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | llama3.1:8b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM 5–14B | C | 471 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
| NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 | 35.00 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Qwen 3 8B NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM 5–14B | C | unknown power not published not published | NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json) 2026-07-21 (page last edited) |
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 214 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | deepseek-r1:1.5b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B | C | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
| NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 | 95.00 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Qwen3-VL-2B NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM ≤4B | C | unknown power not published not published | NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json) 2026-07-21 (page last edited) |
Grades: A audited MLPerf · B third-party · C community · D vendor. How we rank · JSON