HWBenchedge-AI hardware data, cited & graded

NVIDIA DGX Spark vs TI AM68A (8 TOPS)

NVIDIA DGX Spark desktop AI computer, gold metal-foam chassis, oblique view on a wooden table
NVIDIA DGX Spark. Photo: Daniel Lu (User:dllu), CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Texas Instrumentsedge SoC · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

NVIDIA DGX SparkTI AM68A (8 TOPS)
Best object detection990 FPS B
undated
83.75 FPS C
undated
Power153 W specn/a
Perf / W6.47 FPS/W specn/a
Price$4699 list$174.197 list
Workloads with data2 of 71 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA DGX Spark990 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO11n
FP16 · Ultralytics TensorRT · nano (YOLO-n)
B153 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Ultralytics docs benchmark table
undated
TI AM68A (8 TOPS)
MIXED: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n)
83.75 FPS
inference_time · b=1
yolov7_tiny
INT8 · TI Edge AI SDK / TIDL (edgeai-benchmark) · unknown
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
TI edgeai-tensorlab tech report: speed/accuracy of object detection models (AM68A)
undated

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for NVIDIA DGX Spark or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for NVIDIA DGX Spark or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for NVIDIA DGX Spark or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for NVIDIA DGX Spark or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for NVIDIA DGX Spark or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Only NVIDIA DGX Spark has published LLM generation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA DGX Spark60.39 tok/s
tg128 · b=1
Llama 2 7B
Q4_0 · llama.cpp Vulkan (FA on, commit 657e011) · LLM 5–14B
C153 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
llama.cpp discussion #10879 Vulkan scoreboard (via GitHub API)
2026-10-10

TI AM68A (8 TOPS):

◌

No published LLM generation results for TI AM68A (8 TOPS) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.