Intel Xeon Gold 5218T vs Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| Intel Xeon Gold 5218T | Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 452 FPS D 2026-10-01 (published) | n/a |
| Power | n/a | n/a |
| Perf / W | n/a | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only Intel Xeon Gold 5218T has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5218T CPU-only | 17.60 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | ssd-resnet34-1200 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mid-size CNN | D | unknown power not published not published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published object detection results for Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Xeon Gold 5218T yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
Only Intel Xeon Gold 5218T has published image classification results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5218T CPU-only | 5447 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | mobilenet-v2 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN | D | unknown power not published not published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published image classification results for Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Xeon Gold 5218T yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 214 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | deepseek-r1:1.5b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B | C | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218T:
No published LLM generation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| Intel Xeon Gold 5218T | Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 452 FPS D 2026-10-01 (published) | n/a |
| Power | n/a | n/a |
| Perf / W | n/a | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only Intel Xeon Gold 5218T has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5218T CPU-only | 17.60 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | ssd-resnet34-1200 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mid-size CNN | D | unknown power not published not published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published object detection results for Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Xeon Gold 5218T yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
Only Intel Xeon Gold 5218T has published image classification results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5218T CPU-only | 5447 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | mobilenet-v2 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN | D | unknown power not published not published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published image classification results for Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Xeon Gold 5218T yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 214 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | deepseek-r1:1.5b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B | C | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218T:
No published LLM generation results for Intel Xeon Gold 5218T or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
Grades: A audited MLPerf · B third-party · C community · D vendor. How we rank · JSON