Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) vs Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) | Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 248 FPS C 2026-09-27 (page last edited) | n/a |
| Power | 80.00 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W | n/a |
| Perf / W | 3.10 FPS/W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 1 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) | 248 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP16 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n) | C | 80.00 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W | Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark 2026-09-27 (page last edited) |
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published object detection results for Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 214 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | deepseek-r1:1.5b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B | C | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake):
No published LLM generation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) | Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 248 FPS C 2026-09-27 (page last edited) | n/a |
| Power | 80.00 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W | n/a |
| Perf / W | 3.10 FPS/W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 1 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) | 248 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP16 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n) | C | 80.00 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 25-80 W | Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark 2026-09-27 (page last edited) |
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published object detection results for Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 214 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | deepseek-r1:1.5b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B | C | 320 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited) |
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake):
No published LLM generation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
Grades: A audited MLPerf · B third-party · C community · D vendor. How we rank · JSON