HWBench

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) vs NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200)

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200)
Best object detection248 FPS C
2026-09-27 (page last edited)
n/a
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data1 of 71 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)248 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
FP16 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark
2026-09-27 (page last edited)

NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200):

◌

No published object detection results for NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

Only NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) has published speech-to-text results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200)22051 FPS
throughput_offline · b=unknown
MLPerf whisper
fp16 · TensorRT 10.14, CUDA 13.1 · unknown
Aunknown power n/a
no power published
MLPerf Inference v6.0, closed division, data-centre suite
2026-04-01 (published)

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake):

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 (4x NVIDIA GB200) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.