HWBench

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8380

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
Best object detection248 FPS C
2026-09-27 (page last edited)
1714 FPS D
2026-10-01 (published)
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data1 of 72 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)248 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
FP16 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark
2026-09-27 (page last edited)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 CPU-only
MIXED: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1
1714 FPS
throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown
yolo_v8n
INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · unknown
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json)
2026-10-01 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 CPU-only22335 FPS
throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown
mobilenet-v2
INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json)
2026-10-01 (published)

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake):

◌

No published image classification results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.