HWBench

Intel Core Ultra 7 368H vs NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000

Split result: Intel Core Ultra 7 368H is faster in 3 and NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 in 1 of 4 like-for-like comparisons.

Intel Core Ultra 7 368HNVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000
Best LLM generation250 tok/s D
2026-10-01 (published)		423 tok/s C
2026-07-21 (page last edited)
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data1 of 71 of 7

Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

◌

No published object detection results for Intel Core Ultra 7 368H or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 368H or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 368H or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Intel Core Ultra 7 368H or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 368H or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core Ultra 7 368H or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM ≤4B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra 7 368H250 tok/s
2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1		minicpm4-0.5b
INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM ≤4B		Dunknown power n/a
no power published		OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-368H.csv)
2026-10-01 (published)
NVIDIA Jetson Thor T400095.00 tok/s
generation_throughput · b=1		Qwen3-VL-2B
NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM ≤4B		Cunknown power n/a
no power published		NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json)
2026-07-21 (page last edited)
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM 5–14B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra 7 368H83.33 tok/s
2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1		lfm2-8b-a1b
INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM 5–14B		Dunknown power n/a
no power published		OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-368H.csv)
2026-10-01 (published)
NVIDIA Jetson Thor T400035.00 tok/s
generation_throughput · b=1		Qwen 3 8B
NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM 5–14B		Cunknown power n/a
no power published		NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json)
2026-07-21 (page last edited)
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM 15–40B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA Jetson Thor T400057.00 tok/s
generation_throughput · b=1		Qwen3-30B-A3B
NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM 15–40B		Cunknown power n/a
no power published		NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json)
2026-07-21 (page last edited)
Intel Core Ultra 7 368H52.36 tok/s
2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1		lfm2-24b-a2b
INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM 15–40B		Dunknown power n/a
no power published		OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-368H.csv)
2026-10-01 (published)
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class unknown, batch 1 (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra 7 368H227 tok/s
2nd-token throughput, input 1024 tokens · b=1		gemma-3-270m
INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · unknown		Dunknown power n/a
no power published		OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-368H.csv)
2026-10-01 (published)
NVIDIA Jetson Thor T400094.00 tok/s
generation_throughput · b=1		Pi 0.5
NVFP4 + FP8 · TRT · unknown		Cunknown power n/a
no power published		NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json)
2026-07-21 (page last edited)
How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.