Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| Intel Core Ultra 7 265H | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 164 FPS D 2026-10-01 (published) | 248 FPS C 2026-09-27 (page last edited) |
| Power | n/a | n/a |
| Perf / W | n/a | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) | 248 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP16 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n) | C | unknown power n/a no power published | Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark 2026-09-27 (page last edited) |
| Intel Core Ultra 7 265H CPU-only MIXED: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1 | 164 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | yolo_v8n FP16 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · unknown | D | unknown power n/a no power published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 265H or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 265H or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
Only Intel Core Ultra 7 265H has published image classification results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 7 265H CPU-only | 2271 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | mobilenet-v2 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN | D | unknown power n/a no power published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake):
No published image classification results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or Intel Core Ultra 7 265H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 265H or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core Ultra 7 265H or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
No published LLM generation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 265H or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
How to read these numbers
Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.