Intel Core 5 330 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 368H

No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.

Intel Core Ultra 7 368H is faster in all 3 like-for-like comparisons (largest gap: LLM generation, 2.04×).

	Intel Core 5 330	Intel Core Ultra 7 368H
Best LLM generation	137 tok/s D undated	250 tok/s D undated
Power	n/a	n/a
Perf / W	n/a	n/a
Price	n/a	n/a
Workloads with data	1 of 7	1 of 7

Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

◌

No published object detection results for Intel Core 5 330 or Intel Core Ultra 7 368H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Intel Core 5 330 or Intel Core Ultra 7 368H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Intel Core 5 330 or Intel Core Ultra 7 368H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Intel Core 5 330 or Intel Core Ultra 7 368H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core 5 330 or Intel Core Ultra 7 368H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core 5 330 or Intel Core Ultra 7 368H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM ≤4B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Intel Core Ultra 7 368H	250 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1	minicpm4-0.5b INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM ≤4B	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-368H.csv) undated
Intel Core 5 330	137 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1	minicpm4-0.5b INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM ≤4B	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_5-330.csv) undated

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM 5–14B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Intel Core Ultra 7 368H	83.33 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1	lfm2-8b-a1b INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM 5–14B	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-368H.csv) undated
Intel Core 5 330	40.82 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1	lfm2-8b-a1b INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM 5–14B	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_5-330.csv) undated

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class unknown, batch 1 (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Intel Core Ultra 7 368H	227 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 1024 tokens · b=1	gemma-3-270m INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · unknown	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-368H.csv) undated
Intel Core 5 330	127 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 1024 tokens · b=1	gemma-3-270m INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · unknown	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_5-330.csv) undated

How to read these numbers

Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.