Intel Celeron 6305E vs Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| Intel Celeron 6305E | Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 119 FPS D 2026-10-01 (published) | n/a |
| Power | 15.00 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included | n/a |
| Perf / W | 7.93 FPS/W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only Intel Celeron 6305E has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Celeron 6305E CPU-only | 5.26 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | ssd-resnet34-1200 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mid-size CNN | D | 15.00 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published object detection results for Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Celeron 6305E yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for Intel Celeron 6305E or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for Intel Celeron 6305E or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
Only Intel Celeron 6305E has published image classification results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Celeron 6305E CPU-only | 506 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | mobilenet-v2 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN | D | 15.00 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published) |
Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published image classification results for Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or Intel Celeron 6305E yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Celeron 6305E or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for Intel Celeron 6305E or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 34.52 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | llama3.1:8b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM 5–14B | C | unknown power not published not published | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-11-10 (page last edited) |
Intel Celeron 6305E:
No published LLM generation results for Intel Celeron 6305E or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
Grades: A audited MLPerf · B third-party · C community · D vendor. How we rank · JSON