Intel Atom X6425E vs Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only)
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| Intel Atom X6425E | Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 36.26 FPS D undated | 14.92 FPS B undated |
| Power | n/a | n/a |
| Perf / W | n/a | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 4 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only | 14.92 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32/default · Ultralytics NCNN · nano (YOLO-n) | B | unknown power n/a no power published | Ultralytics docs benchmark table undated |
| Intel Atom X6425E CPU-only MIXED: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1 | 36.26 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | yolo_v8n INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · unknown | D | unknown power n/a no power published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) undated |
No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for Intel Atom X6425E or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for Intel Atom X6425E or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only | 29.59 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n-cls FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n) | B | unknown power n/a no power published | Ultralytics docs: Hailo integration benchmark 2026 (year only) |
| Intel Atom X6425E CPU-only MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1 | 226 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown | mobilenet-v2 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN | D | unknown power n/a no power published | OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) undated |
No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.
semantic segmentation
Only Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) has published semantic segmentation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only | 1.20 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n-sem FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n) | B | unknown power n/a no power published | Ultralytics docs: Hailo integration benchmark 2026 (year only) |
Intel Atom X6425E:
No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Atom X6425E or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for Intel Atom X6425E or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only | 1.20 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B | C | 13.00 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) undated |
Intel Atom X6425E:
No published LLM generation results for Intel Atom X6425E or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
How to read these numbers
Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.