HWBenchedge-AI hardware data, cited & graded

HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs NVIDIA DGX Spark

HPEdatacenter server · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.
NVIDIA DGX Spark desktop AI computer, gold metal-foam chassis, oblique view on a wooden table
NVIDIA DGX Spark. Photo: Daniel Lu (User:dllu), CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition)NVIDIA DGX Spark
Best speech-to-text9228 FPS A
undated
n/a
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/a$4699 list
Workloads with data1 of 72 of 7

Best published speech-to-text result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only NVIDIA DGX Spark has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA DGX Spark990 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO11n
FP16 · Ultralytics TensorRT · nano (YOLO-n)
B153 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Ultralytics docs benchmark table
undated

HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition):

◌

No published object detection results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

Only HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) has published speech-to-text results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition)9228 FPS
throughput_offline · b=unknown
MLPerf whisper
fp4 · TensorRT 10.14.1.48, CUDA 13.0 · unknown
Aunknown power n/a
no power published
MLPerf Inference v6.0 (closed, datacenter) ID 6.0-0054
undated

NVIDIA DGX Spark:

◌

No published speech-to-text results for NVIDIA DGX Spark or HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Only NVIDIA DGX Spark has published LLM generation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA DGX Spark60.39 tok/s
tg128 · b=1
Llama 2 7B
Q4_0 · llama.cpp Vulkan (FA on, commit 657e011) · LLM 5–14B
C153 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
llama.cpp discussion #10879 Vulkan scoreboard (via GitHub API)
2026-10-10

HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition):

◌

No published LLM generation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.