HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) | Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best speech-to-text | 9228 FPS A 2026-04-01 (published) | n/a |
| Power | n/a | n/a |
| Perf / W | n/a | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 1 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published speech-to-text result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
No published object detection results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
Only HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) has published speech-to-text results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) | 9228 FPS throughput_offline · b=unknown | MLPerf whisper fp4 · TensorRT 10.14.1.48, CUDA 13.0 · unknown | A | unknown power not published not published | MLPerf Inference v6.0, closed division, data-centre suite 2026-04-01 (published) |
Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published speech-to-text results for Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 34.52 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | llama3.1:8b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM 5–14B | C | unknown power not published not published | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-11-10 (page last edited) |
HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition):
No published LLM generation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
Grades: A audited MLPerf · B third-party · C community · D vendor. How we rank · JSON