HWBench

HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition)Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)
Best speech-to-text9228 FPS A
2026-04-01 (published)
n/a
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data1 of 71 of 7

Best published speech-to-text result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake)248 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
FP16 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark
2026-09-27 (page last edited)

HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition):

◌

No published object detection results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

Only HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) has published speech-to-text results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition)9228 FPS
throughput_offline · b=unknown
MLPerf whisper
fp4 · TensorRT 10.14.1.48, CUDA 13.0 · unknown
Aunknown power n/a
no power published
MLPerf Inference v6.0, closed division, data-centre suite
2026-04-01 (published)

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake):

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) or HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen11 (4x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (Panther Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.