HWBench

Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 vs Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only)

Raspberry Pi 5 single-board computer, top view, showing the Broadcom SoC, RAM, USB and Ethernet ports
Raspberry Pi 5. Photo: SimonWaldherr, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Showing the newest results per platform and source. 18 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 18 superseded by newer results from the same source.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only)
Best semantic segmentation303 FPS D
Older data (2020)
1.20 FPS B
2026-10-11 (page last edited)
Power2.00 W specn/a
Perf / W152 FPS/W specn/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data1 of 74 of 7

Best published semantic segmentation result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only14.92 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
FP32/default · Ultralytics NCNN · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation (benchmark table)
2026-10-03 (page last edited)

Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0:

◌

No published object detection results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only29.59 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n-cls
FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark
2026-10-11 (page last edited)

Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0:

◌

No published image classification results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only1.20 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n-sem
FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark
2026-10-11 (page last edited)
Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0
MIXED: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n)
303 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Only Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) has published LLM generation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only1.20 tok/s
generation_throughput · b=1
DeepSeek R1 14b
as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B
C13.00 W measured
reported in result source — measured
Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables)
2026-09-22 (page last edited)

Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0:

◌

No published LLM generation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only)
Best object detection154 FPS D
Older data (2019)
14.92 FPS B
2026-10-03 (page last edited)
Power2.00 W specn/a
Perf / W76.92 FPS/W specn/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data3 of 74 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only14.92 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
FP32/default · Ultralytics NCNN · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation (benchmark table)
2026-10-03 (page last edited)
Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0
MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n)
154 FPS
inference_time · b=1
MobileNet v1 SSD (224x224)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only29.59 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n-cls
FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark
2026-10-11 (page last edited)
Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0
MIXED: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n)
476 FPS
inference_time · b=1
SqueezeNet (224x224)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · unknown
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only1.20 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n-sem
FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark
2026-10-11 (page last edited)
Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0
MIXED: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n)
303 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Only Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) has published LLM generation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only1.20 tok/s
generation_throughput · b=1
DeepSeek R1 14b
as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B
C13.00 W measured
reported in result source — measured
Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables)
2026-09-22 (page last edited)

Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0:

◌

No published LLM generation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.