HWBench

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) vs TI AM68A (8 TOPS)

Showing the newest results per platform and source. 18 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 18 superseded by newer results from the same source.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)TI AM68A (8 TOPS)
Best semantic segmentation175 FPS D
Older data (2020)
n/a
Power2.00 W specn/a
Perf / W87.72 FPS/W specn/a
Pricen/a$174.197 list
Workloads with data1 of 71 of 7

Best published semantic segmentation result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only TI AM68A (8 TOPS) has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
TI AM68A (8 TOPS)83.75 FPS
inference_time · b=1
yolov7_tiny
INT8 · TI Edge AI SDK / TIDL (edgeai-benchmark) · unknown
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
TI edgeai-tensorlab tech report: speed/accuracy of object detection models (AM68A)
Older data (2024)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published object detection results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

Only Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) has published semantic segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)175 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)

TI AM68A (8 TOPS):

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for TI AM68A (8 TOPS) or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)TI AM68A (8 TOPS)
Best object detection90.91 FPS D
Older data (2019)
83.75 FPS C
Older data (2024)
Power2.00 W specn/a
Perf / W45.45 FPS/W specn/a
Pricen/a$174.197 list
Workloads with data3 of 71 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline mobile-class CNN at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs mobile-class CNN.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)90.91 FPS
inference_time · b=1
MobileNet v1 SSD (224x224)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)
TI AM68A (8 TOPS)
MIXED: model-size class unknown vs mobile-class CNN
83.75 FPS
inference_time · b=1
yolov7_tiny
INT8 · TI Edge AI SDK / TIDL (edgeai-benchmark) · unknown
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
TI edgeai-tensorlab tech report: speed/accuracy of object detection models (AM68A)
Older data (2024)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)17.86 FPS
inference_time · b=1
ResNet-50 V1 (299x299)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

TI AM68A (8 TOPS):

◌

No published image classification results for TI AM68A (8 TOPS) or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

Only Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) has published semantic segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)175 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)

TI AM68A (8 TOPS):

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for TI AM68A (8 TOPS) or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or TI AM68A (8 TOPS) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.