HWBenchedge-AI hardware data, cited & graded

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor

Googleedge SBC · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.
NVIDIAedge reference · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor
Best image classification500 FPS D
undated
n/a
Power2.00 W specn/a
Perf / W250 FPS/W specn/a
Pricen/a$3499 list
Workloads with data1 of 72 of 7

Best published image classification result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor719 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
FP16 · Ultralytics TensorRT · nano (YOLO-n)
B130 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Ultralytics docs benchmark table
undated

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published object detection results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)175 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
undated

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor:

◌

No published image classification results for NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Only NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor has published LLM generation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor45.00 tok/s
tok/s gen, concurrency 1 · b=1
Qwen2.5-VL 7B
n/s on page · NVIDIA (vLLM/TensorRT-LLM per page) · LLM 5–14B
D130 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
NVIDIA Jetson Benchmarks
undated

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published LLM generation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.