HWBench

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake)

Showing the newest results per platform and source. 18 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 18 superseded by newer results from the same source.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake)
Best semantic segmentation175 FPS D
Older data (2020)
n/a
Power2.00 W specn/a
Perf / W87.72 FPS/W specn/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data1 of 71 of 7

Best published semantic segmentation result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake)173 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
INT8 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark
2026-09-27 (page last edited)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published object detection results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

Only Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) has published semantic segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)175 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake):

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake)
Best object detection90.91 FPS D
Older data (2019)
173 FPS C
2026-09-27 (page last edited)
Power2.00 W specn/a
Perf / W45.45 FPS/W specn/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data3 of 71 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake)173 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
INT8 · Ultralytics + OpenVINO 2026.2.1 · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark
2026-09-27 (page last edited)
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)
MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n)
90.91 FPS
inference_time · b=1
MobileNet v1 SSD (224x224)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)17.86 FPS
inference_time · b=1
ResNet-50 V1 (299x299)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake):

◌

No published image classification results for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

Only Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) has published semantic segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)175 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake):

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Meteor Lake) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.