Dell Pro Max with GB10 vs NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000

No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.

Split result: Dell Pro Max with GB10 is faster in 2 and NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 in 1 of 3 like-for-like comparisons.

	Dell Pro Max with GB10	NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000
Best LLM generation	97.93 tok/s C undated	423 tok/s C undated
Power	129 W measured	n/a
Perf / W	0.762 tok/s/W measured	n/a
Price	n/a	n/a
Workloads with data	2 of 7	1 of 7

Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only Dell Pro Max with GB10 has published object detection results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Dell Pro Max with GB10	78.73 FPS throughput_offline · b=unknown	MLPerf yolo-95 fp4 · CUDA 13.0 · unknown	A	unknown power n/a no power published	MLPerf Inference v6.1 (closed, edge) ID Dell_Pro_Max_GB10x1 undated

NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000:

◌

No published object detection results for NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 or Dell Pro Max with GB10 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Dell Pro Max with GB10 or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Dell Pro Max with GB10 or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Dell Pro Max with GB10 or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Dell Pro Max with GB10 or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Dell Pro Max with GB10 or NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM 5–14B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000	35.00 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	Qwen 3 8B NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM 5–14B	C	unknown power n/a no power published	NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json) undated
Dell Pro Max with GB10	23.92 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B	C	138 W measured reported in result source — measured	Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) undated

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM 15–40B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Dell Pro Max with GB10	87.97 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	gpt-oss 20b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 15–40B	C	123 W measured reported in result source — measured	Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) undated
NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000	57.00 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	Qwen3-30B-A3B NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM 15–40B	C	unknown power n/a no power published	NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json) undated

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM ≤4B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Dell Pro Max with GB10	97.93 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	Llama 3.2:3b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM ≤4B	C	129 W measured reported in result source — measured	Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) undated
NVIDIA Jetson Thor T4000	95.00 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	Qwen3-VL-2B NVFP4 · vLLM · LLM ≤4B	C	unknown power n/a no power published	NVIDIA Jetson AI Lab benchmarks (benchmarks.json) undated

How to read these numbers

Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.