HWBench

Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super

Showing the newest results per platform and source. 18 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 18 superseded by newer results from the same source.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only)NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super
Best semantic segmentation5.24 FPS D
Older data (2020)
67.47 FPS C
2026-08-02 (published)
Powern/a25.00 W spec
Perf / Wn/a2.70 FPS/W spec
Pricen/a$249 list
Workloads with data1 of 72 of 7

Best published semantic segmentation result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super263 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
INT8 · Ultralytics TensorRT · nano (YOLO-n)
B25.00 W spec
reported in result source — spec
Ultralytics documentation (benchmark table)
2026-10-13 (page last edited)

Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only):

◌

No published object detection results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline mid-size CNN at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs mid-size CNN.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only5.24 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super
MIXED: model-size class unknown vs mid-size CNN
67.47 FPS
throughput · b=1
SegFormer-B0 (640x640)
FP16 · TensorRT (ONNX export) · unknown
C25.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
arXiv 2608.00927 AgriJetsonBench (abstract figures)
2026-08-02 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only)NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super
Best object detection3.55 FPS D
Older data (2019)
263 FPS B
2026-10-13 (page last edited)
Powern/a25.00 W spec
Perf / Wn/a10.53 FPS/W spec
Pricen/a$249 list
Workloads with data3 of 72 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super263 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
INT8 · Ultralytics TensorRT · nano (YOLO-n)
B25.00 W spec
reported in result source — spec
Ultralytics documentation (benchmark table)
2026-10-13 (page last edited)
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only
MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n)
3.55 FPS
inference_time · b=1
MobileNet v2 SSD (224x224)
TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only0.570 FPS
inference_time · b=1
ResNet-50 V1 (299x299)
TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super:

◌

No published image classification results for NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline mid-size CNN at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs mid-size CNN.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only5.24 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super
MIXED: model-size class unknown vs mid-size CNN
67.47 FPS
throughput · b=1
SegFormer-B0 (640x640)
FP16 · TensorRT (ONNX export) · unknown
C25.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
arXiv 2608.00927 AgriJetsonBench (abstract figures)
2026-08-02 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.