Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) vs Intel Arc B-Series Graphics

Googleedge SBCNo licensed photo yet

Inteldiscrete GPUNo licensed photo yet

Showing the newest results per platform and source. 18 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 18 superseded by newer results from the same source.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

	Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only)	Intel Arc B-Series Graphics
Best semantic segmentation	5.24 FPS D Older data (2020)	n/a
Power	n/a	n/a
Perf / W	n/a	n/a
Price	n/a	n/a
Workloads with data	1 of 7	2 of 7

Best published semantic segmentation result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only Intel Arc B-Series Graphics has published object detection results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Intel Arc B-Series Graphics	58.10 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown	ssd-resnet34-1200 INT8 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mid-size CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published)

Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only):

◌

No published object detection results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or Intel Arc B-Series Graphics yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or Intel Arc B-Series Graphics yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or Intel Arc B-Series Graphics yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Intel Arc B-Series Graphics has published image classification results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Intel Arc B-Series Graphics	2154 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown	mobilenet-v2 FP16 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published)

Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only):

◌

No published image classification results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or Intel Arc B-Series Graphics yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

Only Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) has published semantic segmentation results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only	5.24 FPS inference_time · b=1	Unet Mv2 (128x128) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2020)

Intel Arc B-Series Graphics:

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for Intel Arc B-Series Graphics or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or Intel Arc B-Series Graphics yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or Intel Arc B-Series Graphics yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

	Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only)	Intel Arc B-Series Graphics
Best object detection	3.55 FPS D Older data (2019)	1140 FPS D 2026-10-01 (published)
Power	n/a	n/a
Perf / W	n/a	n/a
Price	n/a	n/a
Workloads with data	3 of 7	2 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline mobile-class CNN at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs mobile-class CNN; batch unknown vs 1.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only	3.55 FPS inference_time · b=1	MobileNet v2 SSD (224x224) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2019)
Intel Arc B-Series Graphics MIXED: model-size class unknown vs mobile-class CNN; batch unknown vs 1	1140 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown	yolo_v8n FP16 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · unknown	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

pose estimation

◌

image classification

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline mid-size CNN at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs mid-size CNN; batch unknown vs 1.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only	0.570 FPS inference_time · b=1	ResNet-50 V1 (299x299) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2019)
Intel Arc B-Series Graphics MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs mid-size CNN; batch unknown vs 1	2154 FPS throughput (OpenVINO benchmark_app) · b=unknown	mobilenet-v2 FP16 · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 · mobile-class CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	OpenVINO official performance benchmarks (graph-data-ov.json) 2026-10-01 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

semantic segmentation

Only Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) has published semantic segmentation results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only	5.24 FPS inference_time · b=1	Unet Mv2 (128x128) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2020)

Intel Arc B-Series Graphics:

◌

speech-to-text

◌

LLM generation

◌

How to read these numbers

Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.