HWBench

Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card vs Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)

Showing the newest results per platform and source. 18 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 18 superseded by newer results from the same source.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 cardGoogle Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)
Best semantic segmentation294 FPS C
2026-10-15 (page last edited)
175 FPS D
Older data (2020)
Powern/a2.00 W spec
Perf / Wn/a87.72 FPS/W spec
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data5 of 71 of 7

Best published semantic segmentation result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card91.00 FPS
throughput · b=1
RetinaFace - Resnet50
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · mid-size CNN
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published object detection results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

Only Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card has published instance segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card186 FPS
throughput · b=1
YOLACT-ResNet50
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · mid-size CNN
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

Only Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card has published pose estimation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card746 FPS
throughput · b=1
YOLOv8n-pose
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

Only Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card has published image classification results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card4257 FPS
throughput · b=1
MobileNetV4-small
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · mobile-class CNN
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published image classification results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline mid-size CNN at batch 1. Differs: model-size class nano (YOLO-n) vs mid-size CNN.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)175 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card
MIXED: model-size class nano (YOLO-n) vs mid-size CNN
294 FPS
throughput · b=1
YOLO26n-sem
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card is faster in all 4 like-for-like comparisons (largest gap: image classification, 247×).

Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 cardGoogle Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)
Best object detection3004 FPS C
2026-10-15 (page last edited)
90.91 FPS D
Older data (2019)
Powern/a2.00 W spec
Perf / Wn/a45.45 FPS/W spec
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data5 of 73 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mobile-class CNN, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card3004 FPS
throughput · b=1
SSD-MobileNetV1
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · mobile-class CNN
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)90.91 FPS
inference_time · b=1
MobileNet v1 SSD (224x224)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

instance segmentation

Only Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card has published instance segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card186 FPS
throughput · b=1
YOLACT-ResNet50
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · mid-size CNN
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

Only Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card has published pose estimation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card746 FPS
throughput · b=1
YOLOv8n-pose
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU):

◌

No published pose estimation results for Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) or Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mid-size CNN, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card4412 FPS
throughput · b=1
ResNet-10t
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · mid-size CNN
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)17.86 FPS
inference_time · b=1
ResNet-50 V1 (299x299)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class mobile-class CNN, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card4257 FPS
throughput · b=1
MobileNetV4-small
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · mobile-class CNN
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)417 FPS
inference_time · b=1
MobileNet v1 (224x224)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)
✓ Like-for-like: model-size class unknown, batch 1 (size or batch not stated by source — unverified). Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card5881 FPS
throughput · b=1
SqueezeNet 1.1
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · unknown
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)500 FPS
inference_time · b=1
SqueezeNet (224x224)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · unknown
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2019)

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline mid-size CNN at batch 1. Differs: model-size class nano (YOLO-n) vs mid-size CNN.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU)175 FPS
inference_time · b=1
Unet Mv2 (128x128)
INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN
D2.00 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1)
Older data (2020)
Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card
MIXED: model-size class nano (YOLO-n) vs mid-size CNN
294 FPS
throughput · b=1
YOLO26n-sem
INT8 · Voyager SDK (GStreamer pipeline) · nano (YOLO-n)
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
2026-10-15 (page last edited)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

◌

No published LLM generation results for Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card or Google Coral Dev Board (Edge TPU) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.