HWBench

Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) vs Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)

Apple Mac mini (M4, 2024), small silver aluminium desktop, front view
Apple Mac mini (M4, 2024) — the M4 Pro model shares this enclosure. Photo: Seasider53, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)
Best object detection357 FPS B
2026-10-01 (page last edited)
117 FPS D
2026-08-10 (published)
Powern/an/a
Perf / Wn/an/a
Pricen/an/a
Workloads with data6 of 73 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)357 FPS
latency_e2e · b=1
YOLO26n
FP16 · Ultralytics 8.4.168 Core AI (coreai-torch 0.4.3), macOS 27.0 · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Apple Core AI integration benchmark
2026-10-01 (page last edited)
Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)
MIXED: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n)
117 FPS
throughput · b=1
yolo-v3-tiny-tf
FP16 · FPGA AI Suite 2026.1.1 / OpenVINO; IP throughput (hostless) · unknown
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Altera FPGA AI Suite Handbook (performance tables)
2026-08-10 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

Only Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) has published instance segmentation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)196 FPS
latency_e2e · b=1
YOLO26n-seg
FP16 · Ultralytics 8.4.168 Core AI (coreai-torch 0.4.3), macOS 27.0 · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Apple Core AI integration benchmark
2026-10-01 (page last edited)

Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite):

◌

No published instance segmentation results for Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) or Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

Only Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) has published pose estimation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)370 FPS
latency_e2e · b=1
YOLO26n-pose
FP16 · Ultralytics 8.4.168 Core AI (coreai-torch 0.4.3), macOS 27.0 · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Apple Core AI integration benchmark
2026-10-01 (page last edited)

Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite):

◌

No published pose estimation results for Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) or Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)417 FPS
latency_e2e · b=1
YOLO26n-cls
FP16 · Ultralytics 8.4.168 Core AI (coreai-torch 0.4.3), macOS 27.0 · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Apple Core AI integration benchmark
2026-10-01 (page last edited)
Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)
MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n)
1391 FPS
throughput · b=1
mobilenet-v1-1.0-224
not stated in table (set by .arch file) · FPGA AI Suite 2026.1.1 / OpenVINO; IP throughput (hostless) · mobile-class CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Altera FPGA AI Suite Handbook (performance tables)
2026-08-10 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n).
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)53.48 FPS
latency_e2e · b=1
YOLO26n-sem
FP16 · Ultralytics 8.4.168 Core AI (coreai-torch 0.4.3), macOS 27.0 · nano (YOLO-n)
Bunknown power n/a
no power published
Ultralytics documentation: Apple Core AI integration benchmark
2026-10-01 (page last edited)
Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite)
MIXED: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n)
10.26 FPS
throughput · b=1
unet-camvid-onnx-0001
not stated in table (set by .arch file) · FPGA AI Suite 2026.1.1 / OpenVINO; IP throughput (hostless) · mid-size CNN
Dunknown power n/a
no power published
Altera FPGA AI Suite Handbook (performance tables)
2026-08-10 (published)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) or Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Only Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) has published LLM generation results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)24.11 tok/s
tg128 · b=1
Llama 2 7B
Q4_0 · llama.cpp Metal (commit 8e672ef) · LLM 5–14B
Cunknown power n/a
no power published
llama.cpp discussion #4167 scoreboard (via GitHub API)
2026-10-01 (page last edited)

Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite):

◌

No published LLM generation results for Terasic DE10-Agilex Development Board (Agilex 7, FPGA AI Suite) or Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.