AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) vs Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only)

FPGA / Versal coverage note: 1,243 rows come from the AMD Vitis AI 3.0/3.5 Model Zoo tables; 733 (59%) are image classification. Detection, segmentation and other workloads are thinner, and there is no LLM or speech data for these boards. All are vendor-published (grade D). FPGA / Versal overview.

AMDeval kit (adaptive SoC)No licensed photo yet

Raspberry Pi 5 single-board computer, top view, showing the Broadcom SoC, RAM, USB and Ethernet ports — Raspberry Pi 5. Photo: SimonWaldherr, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.

	AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG)	Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only)
Best object detection	539 FPS D Older data (2023)	14.92 FPS B 2026-10-03 (page last edited)
Power	n/a	n/a
Perf / W	n/a	n/a
Price	n/a	n/a
Workloads with data	4 of 7	4 of 7

Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only	14.92 FPS inference_time · b=1	YOLO26n FP32/default · Ultralytics NCNN · nano (YOLO-n)	B	unknown power n/a no power published	Ultralytics documentation (benchmark table) 2026-10-03 (page last edited)
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) MIXED: model-size class unknown vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1	539 FPS E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown	pt_yolox-nano_coco_416_416_1G INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · unknown	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table Older data (2023)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

Only AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) has published pose estimation results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG)	391 FPS E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown	pt_movenet_coco_192_192_0.5G INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · mobile-class CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table Older data (2023)

Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only):

◌

No published pose estimation results for Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) or AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only	29.59 FPS inference_time · b=1	YOLO26n-cls FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n)	B	unknown power n/a no power published	Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark 2026-10-11 (page last edited)
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1	4832 FPS E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown	tf_mobilenetv1_0.25_imagenet_128_128_27M INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · mobile-class CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table Older data (2023)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

semantic segmentation

⚠ MIXED COMPARISON — not like-for-like. Baseline nano (YOLO-n) at batch 1. Differs: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only	1.20 FPS inference_time · b=1	YOLO26n-sem FP32 · Ultralytics PyTorch (CPU) · nano (YOLO-n)	B	unknown power n/a no power published	Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark 2026-10-11 (page last edited)
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) MIXED: model-size class mid-size CNN vs nano (YOLO-n); batch unknown vs 1	437 FPS E2E throughput, multi thread · b=unknown	tf2_2d-unet_nuclei_128_128_5.31G INT8 · Vitis AI 3.0 (VART) · mid-size CNN	D	unknown power n/a no power published	Vitis AI 3.0 Model Zoo performance table Older data (2023)

No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

Only Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) has published LLM generation results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) CPU-only	1.20 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B	C	13.00 W measured reported in result source — measured	Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited)

AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG):

◌

No published LLM generation results for AMD Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU102 (ZU9EG) or Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

How to read these numbers

Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.