AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) vs Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling)

AMDAI mini-PCNo licensed photo yet

(independent test)independent test systemNo licensed photo yet

Showing the newest results per platform and source. 11 superseded older results are hidden.Showing all results, including 11 superseded by newer results from the same source.

Split result: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) is faster in 1 and Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) in 1 of 2 like-for-like comparisons.

	AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S)	Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
Best LLM generation	249 tok/s C 2026-03-03 (published)	214 tok/s C 2025-05-06 (page last edited)
Power	120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W	320 W ● Measured, Whole system
Perf / W	2.08 tok/s/W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W	0.669 tok/s/W ● Measured, Whole system
Price	n/a	n/a
Workloads with data	2 of 7	1 of 7

Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published object detection results.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S)	476 FPS inference_time · b=1	YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n)	B	120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W	Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited)

Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling):

◌

No published object detection results for Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM 5–14B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling)	113 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	llama3.1:8b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM 5–14B	C	471 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system	Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S)	47.30 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	Llama 2 7B Q4_K_M · llama.cpp (llama-bench; best backend per README, mostly Vulkan RADV / ROCm 7 nightlies) · LLM 5–14B	C	120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W	visorcraft/strix-halo-llm-perf README (single-host table) 2026-03-03 (published)

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM ≤4B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.

Platform	Result	Model · precision · stack	Grade	Power	Source
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S)	249 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	TinyLlama 1.1B Q4_K_M · llama.cpp (llama-bench; best backend per README, mostly Vulkan RADV / ROCm 7 nightlies) · LLM ≤4B	C	120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W	visorcraft/strix-halo-llm-perf README (single-host table) 2026-03-03 (published)
Radxa Oryon O6 Mini ITX Board (as tested by Jeff Geerling)	214 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1	deepseek-r1:1.5b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B	C	320 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system	Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-05-06 (page last edited)