AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) vs NVIDIA DGX Spark

Split result: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) is faster in 1 and NVIDIA DGX Spark in 2 of 3 like-for-like comparisons.
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | NVIDIA DGX Spark | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 476 FPS B 2026-10-04 (page last edited) | 990 FPS B 2026-09-27 (page last edited) |
| Power | 120 W spec | 153 W spec |
| Perf / W | 3.97 FPS/W spec | 6.47 FPS/W spec |
| Price | n/a | $6950 list |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 2 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA DGX Spark | 990 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO11n FP16 · Ultralytics TensorRT · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 153 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Ultralytics documentation (benchmark table) 2026-09-27 (page last edited) |
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 476 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited) |
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or NVIDIA DGX Spark yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA DGX Spark | 60.39 tok/s tg128 · b=1 | Llama 2 7B Q4_0 · llama.cpp Vulkan (FA on, commit 657e011) · LLM 5–14B | C | 153 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | llama.cpp discussion #10879 Vulkan scoreboard (via GitHub API) 2026-10-10 (page last edited) |
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) CPU-only | 11.37 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B | C | 140 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 62.09 tok/s tg128 · b=unknown | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B UD-Q4_K_XL · llama.cpp Vulkan RADV b10687 · LLM >40B | C | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | StrixHaloGuide evidence (llama-bench, 20 repeats) 2026-10-02 (page last edited) |
| NVIDIA DGX Spark | 4.56 tok/s tg · b=unknown | 70B-class LLM (Q4) ~Q4 · as reviewed (Ollama/llama.cpp class) · LLM >40B | C | 153 W measured reported in result source — measured | vminstall.com review 2026-03-20 (page last edited) |
How to read these numbers
Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.