AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) vs Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) is faster in all 3 like-for-like comparisons (largest gap: LLM generation, 69.35×).
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best LLM generation | 249 tok/s C 2026-03-03 (published) | 71.36 tok/s C 2025-11-10 (page last edited) |
| Power | 120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W | n/a |
| Perf / W | 2.08 tok/s/W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 476 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W | Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited) |
Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling):
No published object detection results for Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 47.30 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Llama 2 7B Q4_K_M · llama.cpp (llama-bench; best backend per README, mostly Vulkan RADV / ROCm 7 nightlies) · LLM 5–14B | C | 120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W | visorcraft/strix-halo-llm-perf README (single-host table) 2026-03-03 (published) |
| Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 34.52 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | llama3.1:8b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM 5–14B | C | unknown power not published not published | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-11-10 (page last edited) |
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 249 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | TinyLlama 1.1B Q4_K_M · llama.cpp (llama-bench; best backend per README, mostly Vulkan RADV / ROCm 7 nightlies) · LLM ≤4B | C | 120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W | visorcraft/strix-halo-llm-perf README (single-host table) 2026-03-03 (published) |
| Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) | 71.36 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | llama3.2:3b Ollama default tag (4-bit unless tag says otherwise) · Ollama (geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark) · LLM ≤4B | C | unknown power not published not published | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks issue results (comments) 2025-11-10 (page last edited) |
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 53.40 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | GPT-OSS 120B Q4_K_M · llama.cpp (llama-server; best backend per README, mostly Vulkan RADV / ROCm 7 nightlies) · LLM >40B | C | 120 W Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W reported in result source — Chip TDP, Accelerator only, host not included, max of range 45-120 W | visorcraft/strix-halo-llm-perf README (single-host table) 2026-03-03 (published) |
| Minisforum MS-R1 (as tested by Jeff Geerling) CPU-only | 0.770 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Llama 3.1:70b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM >40B | C | 38.20 W ● Measured, Whole system reported in result source — Measured, Whole system | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
Grades: A audited MLPerf · B third-party · C community · D vendor. How we rank · JSON