AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Split result: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) is faster in 1 and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H in 2 of 3 like-for-like comparisons.
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
|---|---|---|
| Best LLM generation | 94.64 tok/s C 2026-10-02 (page last edited) | 115 tok/s D 2026-10-01 (published) |
| Power | 120 W spec | n/a |
| Perf / W | 0.789 tok/s/W spec | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 476 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited) |
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H:
No published object detection results for Intel Core Ultra 7 255H or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Intel Core Ultra 7 255H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Intel Core Ultra 7 255H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Intel Core Ultra 7 255H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Intel Core Ultra 7 255H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Intel Core Ultra 7 255H yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | 110 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1 | minicpm4-0.5b INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM ≤4B | D | unknown power n/a no power published | OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-255H.csv) 2026-10-01 (published) |
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 88.14 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Llama 3.2:3b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM ≤4B | C | 133 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | 31.35 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1 | lfm2-8b-a1b INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM 5–14B | D | unknown power n/a no power published | OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-255H.csv) 2026-10-01 (published) |
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) CPU-only | 11.37 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B | C | 140 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 47.50 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | Qwen3-Coder 30B (MoE, 3.3B active) not stated per model · Ollama (OpenAI-compatible endpoint) · LLM 15–40B | C | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Adam Taylor (Adiuvo Engineering) (manual extraction) 2026-09-23 (published) |
| Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | 16.89 tok/s 2nd-token throughput, input 32 tokens · b=1 | lfm2-24b-a2b INT4-MIXED · OpenVINO 2026.4.1 GenAI · LLM 15–40B | D | unknown power n/a no power published | OpenVINO official LLM benchmarks (llm_models_7-255H.csv) 2026-10-01 (published) |
How to read these numbers
Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.