AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) vs Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 476 FPS B 2026-10-04 (page last edited) | n/a |
| Power | 120 W spec | n/a |
| Perf / W | 3.97 FPS/W spec | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 476 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited) |
Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0:
No published object detection results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
Only Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 has published semantic segmentation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 | 303 FPS inference_time · b=1 | Unet Mv2 (128x128) INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN | D | 2.00 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2020) |
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S):
No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) CPU-only | 11.37 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B | C | 140 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0:
No published LLM generation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 476 FPS B 2026-10-04 (page last edited) | 154 FPS D Older data (2019) |
| Power | 120 W spec | 2.00 W spec |
| Perf / W | 3.97 FPS/W spec | 76.92 FPS/W spec |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 3 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 476 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited) |
| Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n) | 154 FPS inference_time · b=1 | MobileNet v1 SSD (224x224) INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN | D | 2.00 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2019) |
No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
Only Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 has published image classification results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 | 20.41 FPS inference_time · b=1 | ResNet-50 V1 (299x299) INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN | D | 2.00 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2019) |
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S):
No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
Only Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 has published semantic segmentation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 | 303 FPS inference_time · b=1 | Unet Mv2 (128x128) INT8 · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN | D | 2.00 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2020) |
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S):
No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) CPU-only | 11.37 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B | C | 140 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0:
No published LLM generation results for Google Coral USB Accelerator (Edge TPU) on Xeon Gold 6154 host, USB 3.0 or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
How to read these numbers
Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.