AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) vs Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only)
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 476 FPS B 2026-10-04 (page last edited) | n/a |
| Power | 120 W spec | n/a |
| Perf / W | 3.97 FPS/W spec | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published object detection results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 476 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited) |
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only):
No published object detection results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
Only Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) has published semantic segmentation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only | 5.24 FPS inference_time · b=1 | Unet Mv2 (128x128) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN | D | unknown power n/a no power published | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2020) |
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S):
No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) CPU-only | 11.37 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B | C | 140 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only):
No published LLM generation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
No like-for-like comparison yet: both have published results, but model size or batch differ. Treat the numbers below as indicative only.
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best object detection | 476 FPS B 2026-10-04 (page last edited) | 3.55 FPS D Older data (2019) |
| Power | 120 W spec | n/a |
| Perf / W | 3.97 FPS/W spec | n/a |
| Price | n/a | n/a |
| Workloads with data | 2 of 7 | 3 of 7 |
Best published object detection result per platform. n/a = not published; never estimated.
Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups
object detection
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) | 476 FPS inference_time · b=1 | YOLO26n FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n) | B | 120 W spec platform spec envelope (not measured with this result) | Ultralytics documentation: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark 2026-10-04 (page last edited) |
| Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only MIXED: model-size class mobile-class CNN vs nano (YOLO-n) | 3.55 FPS inference_time · b=1 | MobileNet v2 SSD (224x224) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mobile-class CNN | D | unknown power n/a no power published | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2019) |
No shared like-for-like group exists for this pair.
instance segmentation
No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
pose estimation
No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
image classification
Only Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) has published image classification results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only | 0.570 FPS inference_time · b=1 | ResNet-50 V1 (299x299) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN | D | unknown power n/a no power published | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2019) |
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S):
No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
semantic segmentation
Only Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) has published semantic segmentation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) CPU-only | 5.24 FPS inference_time · b=1 | Unet Mv2 (128x128) TFLite on CPU · TensorFlow Lite C++ benchmark (Edge TPU runtime) · mid-size CNN | D | unknown power n/a no power published | Google Coral Edge TPU benchmarks page (Table 1) Older data (2020) |
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S):
No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
speech-to-text
No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
LLM generation
Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published LLM generation results.
| Platform | Result | Model · precision · stack | Grade | Power | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) CPU-only | 11.37 tok/s generation_throughput · b=1 | DeepSeek R1 14b as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B | C | 140 W measured reported in result source — measured | Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables) 2026-09-22 (page last edited) |
Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only):
No published LLM generation results for Coral Dev Board CPU (quad Cortex-A53 @1.5 GHz, CPU only) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.
How to read these numbers
Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.