HWBenchedge-AI hardware data, cited & graded

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU

AMDAI mini-PC · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.
AMDAI PC / mini-PC · no photo yet
No licensed photo available — placeholder drawing.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU is faster in the only like-for-like comparison (largest gap: LLM generation, 4.78×).

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S)AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU
Best LLM generation94.64 tok/s C
2026-10
54.38 tok/s C
2026-10-10
Power120 W spec120 W spec
Perf / W0.789 tok/s/W spec0.453 tok/s/W spec
Pricen/a$3999 list
Workloads with data2 of 71 of 7

Best published LLM generation result per platform (may be from different like-for-like groups — see data). n/a = not published; never estimated.

Show data — all workloads, sources and like-for-like groups

object detection

Only AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) has published object detection results.

PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S)476 FPS
inference_time · b=1
YOLO26n
FP32 · Ultralytics 8.4.165 ONNX Runtime MIGraphX EP · nano (YOLO-n)
B120 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
Ultralytics docs: AMD ROCm/MIGraphX integration benchmark
2026 (year only)

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU:

◌

No published object detection results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

instance segmentation

◌

No published instance segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

pose estimation

◌

No published pose estimation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

image classification

◌

No published image classification results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

semantic segmentation

◌

No published semantic segmentation results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

speech-to-text

◌

No published speech-to-text results for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) or AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU yet.
We only show cited public figures — nothing is estimated to fill gaps. Requests tell us what to source or test next.

LLM generation

✓ Like-for-like: model-size class LLM 5–14B, batch 1. Model, precision and stack may still differ.
PlatformResultModel · precision · stackGradePowerSource
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) iGPU54.38 tok/s
tg128 · b=1
Llama 2 7B
Q4_0 · llama.cpp Vulkan (FA on, commit fb4b273) · LLM 5–14B
C120 W spec
platform spec envelope (not measured with this result)
llama.cpp discussion #10879 Vulkan scoreboard (via GitHub API)
2026-10-10
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / PRO 395 (Strix Halo, Radeon 8060S) CPU-only11.37 tok/s
generation_throughput · b=1
DeepSeek R1 14b
as in linked issue (Ollama default tags are 4-bit) · Ollama / llama.cpp (see linked issue) · LLM 5–14B
C140 W measured
reported in result source — measured
Jeff Geerling ai-benchmarks README (Findings tables)
undated
How to read these numbers
Every number is labelled. Confidence: A MLPerf closed, audited · B documented third-party method · C community / review · D vendor-published, not independently verified · E estimate. Power basis: measured with the result · spec vendor spec/envelope · power n/a not published.

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.