HWBenchedge-AI hardware data, cited & graded

Which board runs YOLO fastest under 30 W and $600?

Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host): 1036 FPS (yolov8n, INT8 (Hailo quantized); grade D; undated). Next: Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) 375 FPS; Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) 357 FPS. Like-for-like group: nano (YOLO-n), batch 1.

Top results
#PlatformResultPerf/WPriceGrade · dateSource
1Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host)1036 FPS
yolov8n · INT8 (Hailo quantized)
414 specunknownD undatedHailo Model Zoo public models (Hailo-8)
2Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host)375 FPS
yolov8n · INT8 (Hailo quantized)
150 specunknownD undatedHailo Model Zoo public models (Hailo-10H)
3Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)357 FPS
YOLO26n · FP16
unknownunknownB 2026 (year only)Ultralytics docs: Apple Core AI integration benchmark
4Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Lunar Lake)300 FPS
YOLO26n · FP32
unknownunknownC 2026 (year only)Ultralytics docs: Intel OpenVINO integration benchmark
5NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB287 FPS
YOLO26n · INT8
unknownunknownB undatedUltralytics docs benchmark table

Filters: task=object detection, power=30, budget=600. Ranking: boards that meet every known target, then headroom and perf/W; unknown power or price is not penalised. Open in /find · JSON

Sources

Generated 2026-10-16 from HWBench data only. All answers · Submit a result

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.