HWBenchedge-AI hardware data, cited & graded

Hailo-8 vs Hailo-10H: which is faster?

Split: Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) faster in 20, Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) in 6 of 26. Example, object detection (nano (YOLO-n), batch 1): Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) 1036 vs Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) 375 FPS.

Like-for-like comparisons
Workload · groupHailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host)Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host)Faster
object detection
nano (YOLO-n) · batch 1
1036 FPS D undated
yolov8n · source
375 FPS D undated
yolov8n · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (2.76×)
object detection
nano (YOLO-n) · batch 8
1036 FPS D undated
yolov8n · source
370 FPS D undated
yolov8n · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (2.80×)
object detection
small (YOLO-s) · batch 1
633 FPS D undated
yolov5s_wo_spp · source
261 FPS D undated
yolov5s_wo_spp · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (2.43×)
object detection
small (YOLO-s) · batch 8
633 FPS D undated
yolov5s_wo_spp · source
370 FPS D undated
yolov5s_wo_spp · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.71×)
object detection
medium (YOLO-m) · batch 1
242 FPS D undated
yolov5m_wo_spp · source
122 FPS D undated
yolov5m_wo_spp · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.98×)
object detection
medium (YOLO-m) · batch 8
242 FPS D undated
yolov5m_wo_spp · source
208 FPS D undated
yolov5m_wo_spp · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.16×)
instance segmentation
medium (YOLO-m) · batch 1
68.70 FPS D undated
yolov5m_seg · source
66.70 FPS D undated
yolov8m_seg · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.03×)
instance segmentation
medium (YOLO-m) · batch 8
125 FPS D undated
yolov5m_seg · source
94.50 FPS D undated
yolov8m_seg · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.32×)
instance segmentation
nano (YOLO-n) · batch 1
528 FPS D undated
yolov8n_seg · source
311 FPS D undated
yolov8n_seg · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.70×)
instance segmentation
nano (YOLO-n) · batch 8
528 FPS D undated
yolov8n_seg · source
212 FPS D undated
yolov8n_seg · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (2.49×)
instance segmentation
small (YOLO-s) · batch 1
331 FPS D undated
yolov5s_seg · source
177 FPS D undated
yolov5s_seg · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.87×)
instance segmentation
small (YOLO-s) · batch 8
331 FPS D undated
yolov5s_seg · source
162 FPS D undated
yolov8s_seg · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (2.04×)
pose estimation
medium (YOLO-m) · batch 1
68.60 FPS D undated
yolov8m_pose · source
79.20 FPS D undated
yolov8m_pose · source
Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.15×)
pose estimation
medium (YOLO-m) · batch 8
145 FPS D undated
yolov8m_pose · source
129 FPS D undated
yolov8m_pose · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.12×)
pose estimation
small (YOLO-s) · batch 1
393 FPS D undated
yolov8s_pose · source
161 FPS D undated
yolov8s_pose · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (2.44×)
pose estimation
small (YOLO-s) · batch 8
393 FPS D undated
yolov8s_pose · source
217 FPS D undated
yolov8s_pose · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.81×)
pose estimation
unknown · batch 1
162 FPS D undated
centerpose_regnetx_800mf · source
125 FPS D undated
centerpose_regnetx_800mf · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.30×)
pose estimation
unknown · batch 8
162 FPS D undated
centerpose_regnetx_800mf · source
184 FPS D undated
centerpose_regnetx_800mf · source
Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.14×)
image classification
mobile-class CNN · batch 1
2597 FPS D undated
mobilenet_v2_1.0 · source
2798 FPS D undated
mobilenet_v2_1.0 · source
Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.08×)
image classification
mobile-class CNN · batch 8
2597 FPS D undated
mobilenet_v2_1.0 · source
2753 FPS D undated
mobilenet_v2_1.0 · source
Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.06×)
image classification
mid-size CNN · batch 1
1372 FPS D undated
resnet_v1_50 · source
331 FPS D undated
resnet_v1_50 · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (4.15×)
image classification
mid-size CNN · batch 8
1372 FPS D undated
resnet_v1_50 · source
1024 FPS D undated
resnet_v1_50 · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.34×)
semantic segmentation
mobile-class CNN · batch 1
662 FPS D undated
unet_mobilenet_v2 · source
667 FPS D undated
unet_mobilenet_v2 · source
Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.01×)
semantic segmentation
mobile-class CNN · batch 8
664 FPS D undated
unet_mobilenet_v2 · source
667 FPS D undated
unet_mobilenet_v2 · source
Hailo-10H (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.00×)
semantic segmentation
mid-size CNN · batch 1
42.60 FPS D undated
fcn8_resnet_v1_18 · source
31.40 FPS D undated
fcn8_resnet_v1_18 · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.36×)
semantic segmentation
mid-size CNN · batch 8
42.60 FPS D undated
fcn8_resnet_v1_18 · source
38.80 FPS D undated
fcn8_resnet_v1_18 · source
Hailo-8 (M.2/PCIe, x86 host) (1.10×)

Full comparison page

Sources

Generated 2026-10-16 from HWBench data only. All answers · Submit a result

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.