HWBench

Which hardware is fastest for depth estimation?

The fastest result is the Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s) at 133 FPS, running YOLO26n-depth in FP16. That is a documented third-party result, from a page last edited on 2026-10-01. Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card comes next at 96 FPS, then Axelera Metis Edge 130p PCIe card at 90 FPS. All of these are nano models at batch 1, so they compare directly.

Top results
#PlatformResultPowerPerf/WPriceGrade · dateSource
1Apple M4 (10-core GPU, 120 GB/s)133 FPS
YOLO26n-depth · FP16
unknownunknownunknownB 2026-10-01 (page last edited)Ultralytics documentation: Apple Core AI integration benchmark
2Axelera Metis Embedded 113m M.2 card96 FPS
YOLO26n-Depth · INT8
unknownunknownunknownC 2026-10-15 (page last edited)Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
3Axelera Metis Edge 130p PCIe card90 FPS
YOLO26n-Depth · INT8
unknownunknownunknownC 2026-10-15 (page last edited)Axelera Voyager SDK model zoo (docs/reference/models/model-zoo.md)
4Raspberry Pi 5 + AI HAT+ (Hailo-8)33.8 FPS
YOLO26n-depth · INT8
unknownunknownunknownB 2026-10-11 (page last edited)Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark
5Raspberry Pi 5 (CPU only)0.47 FPS
YOLO26n-depth · FP32
unknownunknownunknownB 2026-10-11 (page last edited)Ultralytics documentation: Hailo integration benchmark

Filters: task=depth estimation. Power marked “spec” is the vendor's rated figure, not a measurement. Ranking: grade A–C dated results first where available, then headroom and perf/W. Open in /find · JSON

Sources

Generated 2026-10-16 from HWBench data only. All answers · Submit a result

Machine-readable: /find.json (see llms.txt); full tables are in “Show data”. Confidence grades: A audited MLPerf closed · B documented third-party · C community · D vendor-published · E estimate. Unknown values are shown as unknown, never estimated. Generated 2026-10-16 from public sources.